4.8 Article

Acid-Base Property of Tetragonal YNbO4 with Phosphate Groups and Its Catalysis for the Dehydration of Glucose to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural

期刊

SMALL STRUCTURES
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sstr.202200224

关键词

biomass valorization; heterogeneous catalyses; material characterizations; mixed metal oxides; solid Lewis acids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The acid-base properties of amphoteric crystalline YNbO4 are adjusted by impregnating phosphate groups, resulting in materials with increased activity and selectivity in glucose dehydration. The introduction of phosphate groups leads to the optimal catalyst, 5P-YNbO4, which exhibits 50% selectivity at 75% conversion. The catalyst can be deactivated due to carbon deposits, but its activity can be completely recovered through washing and calcination.
Acid-base properties of amphoteric crystalline YNbO4, which is synthesized by co-precipitation method using a water-soluble Nb peroxo complex, are adjusted by the impregnation of phosphate groups. The resulting phosphate-YNbO4 materials are tested for glucose dehydration to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). Both activity and selectivity increase by the introduction of phosphate groups, giving the optimal catalyst with five phosphate groups per nm(2) of surface (5P-YNbO4). 5P-YNbO4 shows approximate to 50% selectivity at 75% conversion. Pyridine adsorption experiments show that 5P-YNbO4 exclusively possesses Lewis acidity. NH3- and CO2-temperature programmed desorption measurements confirm that phosphoric acid treatment increases acid strength and acid density with concurrent loss of basicity. Experiments using isotope-labeled glucose clarify that HMF is formed on 5P-YNbO4 through the stepwise dehydration reaction mechanism. Recyclability experiments show an accumulation of carbon deposits at the end of each reaction causing deactivation, but the activity can be completely recovered by successive washing with water and subsequent calcination at 400 degrees C in air.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据