4.6 Article

Beta-lactam exposure and safety in intermittent or continuous infusion in critically ill children: an observational monocenter study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 182, 期 3, 页码 965-973

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04716-0

关键词

Adverse effects; Piperacillin; Meropenem; Cefotaxime; Pharmacokinetics; Pediatric intensive care unit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the pharmacokinetic exposure and clinical toxicity of three beta-lactams in critically ill children, depending on two lengths of infusion. Continuous infusion showed a higher probability of achieving optimal pharmacokinetic targets compared to intermittent infusion, but also carried a higher risk of overexposure. Regular therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended for critically ill children receiving beta-lactams, regardless of the length of infusion.
The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and clinical toxicity for three beta-lactams: cefotaxime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem, depending on two lengths of infusion: continuous and intermittent, in critically ill children. This single center observational prospective study was conducted in a pediatric intensive care unit. All hospitalized children who had one measured plasma concentration of the investigated antibiotics were included. Plasma antibiotic concentrations were interpreted by a pharmacologist, using a Bayesian approach based on previously published population pharmacokinetic models in critically ill children. Exposure was considered optimal, low, or high according to the PK target 100% f(T>4xMIC) and a trough concentration below the toxic concentration (50 mg.L-1 for cefotaxime, 150 mg. L-1 for piperacillin, and 44 mg.L-1 for meropenem). Between May 2019 and January 2020, 80 patients were included and received 106 antibiotic courses: 74 (70%) were administered in intermittent infusion (II) and 32 (30%) in continuous infusion (CI). Compared to II, CI provided more optimal PK exposure (n=22/32, 69% for CI versus n=35/74, 47% for II, OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.01-1.5, p =0.04), less underexposure (n=4/32, 13% for CI versus n=36/74, 49% for II, OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.6-0.84, p < 0.001), and more overexposure (n= 6/32, 19% for CI versus n=3/74, 4% for II, OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.03-1.3, p=0.01). Five adverse events have been reported during the study period, although none has been attributed to beta-lactam treatment. Conclusion: CI provided a higher probability to attain an optimal PK target compared to II, but also a higher risk for overexposure. Regular therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in critically ill children receiving beta-lactams, regardless of the length of infusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据