4.2 Review

Factors influencing self-trapped exciton emission of low-dimensional metal halides

期刊

MATERIALS ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 355-373

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ma00676f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic-inorganic hybrid metal halides (MHs) are widely used in photoelectric applications due to their excellent structure and tunability. By utilizing larger organic cations to separate inorganic metal halides, low-dimensional MHs (LDMHs) can be created at the molecular level, including 2D layers, 1D chains, and 0D clusters. These LDMHs exhibit distinct luminescence properties from 3D MHs, mainly due to the radiative recombination of self-trapped excitons or defect states. The luminescence properties of LDMHs can be greatly altered by factors such as structure distortions and molecular engineering.
Organic-inorganic hybrid metal halides (MHs) are widely used in the field of photoelectricity due to their excellent structure and photoelectric tunability. When separating inorganic metal halides by larger organic cations in crystals, multiple low-dimensional MHs (LDMHs) at the molecular level can be constructed, including two-dimensional (2D) layers, one-dimensional (1D) chains, and zero-dimensional (0D) clusters assembled by octahedral metal halide units. These LDMHPs exhibit significantly different luminescence properties from 3D MHs, which stem from the radiative recombination of self-trapped excitons (STEs) or the defect states. Along with the structure dimensions, the degree of intrinsic and instantaneous structure distortions greatly affects the STE broadband emission of LDMHs. Furthermore, molecular engineering such as the choice of organic cations, electron-phonon coupling effect, external temperature and pressure, and metal ion doping can greatly change the luminescence properties of LDMHs. Herein, we summarize and discuss the factors influencing the STE emission of LDMHs for a better understanding and to prospect the development of LDMHs in future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据