4.6 Article

Not just passengers, but co-pilots! Non-rhizobial nodule-associated bacteria promote cowpea growth and symbiosis with (brady)rhizobia

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 134, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jambio/lxac013

关键词

nodules-associated bacteria (NAB); biological nitrogen fixation; Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi; indole-3-acetic acid; siderophores; Vigna unguiculata

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study isolated and identified non-rhizobial nodule-associated bacteria (NAB) from cowpea root-nodules. It was found that some strains of NAB can promote the growth of cowpea and enhance the efficiency of symbiosis with Bradyrhizobium.
Aims To isolate and characterize non-rhizobial nodule-associated bacteria (NAB) from cowpea root-nodules regarding their performance of plant-growth-promoting mechanisms and their ability to enhance cowpea growth and symbiosis when co-inoculated with bradyrhizobia. Methods and Results Sixteen NAB were isolated, identified, and in vitro evaluated for plant growth promotion traits. The ability to promote cowpea growth was analyzed when co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi BR 3262 in sterile and non-sterile substrates. The 16S rRNA gene sequences analysis revealed that NAB belonged to the genera Chryseobacterium (4), Bacillus (3), Microbacterium (3), Agrobacterium (1), Escherichia (1), Delftia (1), Pelomonas (1), Sphingomonas (1), and Staphylococcus (1). All strains produced different amounts of auxin siderophores and formed biofilms. Twelve out of the 16 strains carried the nifH, a gene associated with nitrogen fixation. Co-inoculation of NAB (ESA 424 and ESA 29) with Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi BR 3262 significantly promoted cowpea growth, especially after simultaneous inoculation with the three strains. Conclusions NAB are efficient cowpea growth promoters and can improve the efficiency of the symbiosis between cowpea and the N-2-fixing microsymbiont B. pachyrhizi BR 3262, mainly under a specific triple microbial association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据