Imaging mismatch between Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score and perfusion imaging may be a good variable for endovascular treatment

Objective Some patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) presented imaging mismatch, low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) with small ischemic core, or high ASPECTS with large ischemic core. The study was designed to explore whether patients with imaging mismatch could benefit from endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with LVO treated with EVT in our center from March 2018 to Jul 2020. Patients were divided into three groups, imaging mismatch, small ischemic core, and large ischemic core groups. Pooled analyses based on stroke onset to treatment time were done. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to explore the factors for good outcomes. Results Sixty-eight of 419 patients with LVO presented with imaging mismatch, and 35 of those (51%) achieved good outcomes after EVT at 90-day. No significant differences were noted in good outcomes and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) between patients with imaging mismatch and small ischemic core. Compared with large ischemic core, patients with imaging mismatch presented lower risk of sICH (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.75, p = 0.011) within 6 h and higher proportion of good outcomes (95% CI 0.37-0.82, p = 0.002) at 6 to 24 h. Baseline NIHSS (odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.95)), ASPECTS (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29), ischemic core (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00), and sICH (OR = 61.61, 95% CI 8.09-461.32) were associated with good outcomes. Conclusions Patients with imaging mismatch treated within 24 h could benefit from EVT and without increasing the risk of sICH.

Automated summary

This study found that patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) and imaging mismatch could benefit from endovascular treatment (EVT) without increasing the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).