4.1 Article

Observation of room-temperature out-of-plane switchable electric polarization in supported 3R-MoS2 monolayers

期刊

SMARTMAT
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/smm2.1161

关键词

3R-MoS2 monolayers; Kelvin probe force microscopy; out-of-plane electric polarization; piezoelectric force microscopy; water; ice molecules

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the observation of room-temperature out-of-plane switchable electric polarization in MoS2 monolayers. Trapped water/ice molecules are found to be responsible for this phenomenon. These findings suggest that monolayers with trapped single layer of polar molecules could be emerging alternatives to 2D ferroelectrics.
Two-dimensional (2D) ferroelectrics have attracted considerable attention due to their potential in the development of devices of miniaturization and multifunction. Although several van der Waals (vdW)-layered materials show ferroelectricity, the experimental demonstrations of ferroelectric behavior in monolayers are very limited. Here we report the observation of room-temperature out-of-plane switchable electric polarization in supported MoS2 monolayers exfoliated from 3R-stacked bulk crystals under ambient conditions. Using in situ piezoelectric force microscopy and Kelvin probe force microscopy in a glovebox, we reveal that trapped water/ice molecules are responsible for this switchable electric polarization and this conclusion is strongly supported by theoretical simulations. It is worth noting that the water/ice trapping in the monolayers exfoliated from 2H-stacked MoS2 crystals is not as much as that in 3R monolayers and, consequently, the out-of-plane electric polarization is missing there. Our findings indicate that monolayers with a trapped single layer of polar molecules might be emerging alternatives to 2D ferroelectrics. Furthermore, the stacking sequences may bring new properties and applications to 2D vdW materials not only when we stack them up but also when we thin them down.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据