4.7 Article

Spray flame structure in conventional and hot-diluted combustion regime

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 162, 期 3, 页码 759-773

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.07.033

关键词

Spray flames; MILD combustion; Liquid breakup; Hot-diluted coflow; PDA; CARS

资金

  1. Technology Foundation STW
  2. Stork Technical Services
  3. Shell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A laboratory scale experimental setup was built to study ethanol pressure-swirl spray flames in a coflow of either air or hot-diluted oxidant. The latter case resembles conditions similar to those found in practical combustion systems of liquid fuels operating in MILD conditions. First, experiments have been performed to investigate the phenomena associated with the atomization process. High-speed visualizations show that in the presence of a hot-diluted coflow, an almost immediate disruption of the liquid jet takes place, indicating significant changes in the atomization mechanism, compared to the case with air coflow. Secondly, a comprehensive set of measurements was obtained by complementary single-point measurement techniques to reveal the gas and droplets flow fields as well as temperature fields. Measurements of droplet size and velocity components in the spray region were obtained by phase Doppler anemometry. Gas temperature was measured using coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy even in regions with droplet density as high as 10(5) cm(-3). It has been observed that in a reacting spray in air coflow, an inner and an outer flame-front are present. For a reacting spray with similar injection pressure in hot-diluted coflow, weakening of the inner flame-front is attributed to the fact that the gaseous mixture becomes increasingly rich towards the center region. Consequently, a significant reduction of occurrence of temperature samples above 2000 K is observed throughout most of the spray region. (C) 2014 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据