4.7 Article

A multilevel investigation of the cascading effect of entrepreneurial leadership on employee creativity: Evidence from Chinese hospitality and tourism firms

期刊

TOURISM MANAGEMENT
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104816

关键词

Entrepreneurial leadership; Employee creativity; Surface acting; Work-related flow; Cascading effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the cascading effect of entrepreneurial leadership on employee creativity in the hospitality and tourism industry. The findings reveal that entrepreneurial leadership has a cross-level indirect relationship with employee creativity, which is transmitted through surface acting and work-related flow. This study contributes to the leadership literature in the tourism discipline by providing empirical evidence of the cross-level effect of entrepreneurial leadership on workplace creativity.
This study aims to elucidate the cascading effect of entrepreneurial leadership on fostering employee creativity in hospitality and tourism firms. Drawing upon multiple theories (e.g., the affective events theory and conservation of resources theory) and utilizing a multilevel mediation model, this study predicts and examines the cross-level indirect relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and employee creativity, which is sequentially transmitted through employees' surface acting and work-related flow. Based on a 2-wave longitudinal design, survey data were obtained from multiple sources consisting of 47 leaders and 352 employees in Chinese hospitality and tourism firms. Multilevel structural equation modeling (MSEM) analysis provides empirical support for the crosslevel mediation model. This study is among the first to provide empirical evidence of the cross-level effect of entrepreneurial leadership on workplace creativity via surface acting and work-related flow in the service industry, which enriches the leadership literature in the tourism discipline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据