4.6 Article

Triple superphosphate modified by tin (II) chloride: As a reusable and efficient catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of xanthene and xanthenone derivatives under green conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1294, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.136383

关键词

Green protocol; Xanthenes; Xanthenones; Heterogeneous catalyst; TSP Three-component reaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple method for preparing tin (II) chloride-triple superphosphate was developed, and its performance was thoroughly characterized. The catalyst exhibited excellent catalytic activity, resulting in high product yields and reduced reaction times.
A simple method was developed for preparing tin (II) chloride-triple superphosphate. The material was thor-oughly characterized using various techniques, including transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), thermog-ravimetric analysis (TGA), and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis. XRD analysis, BET, and SEM images indicated that the catalyst exhibited a crystalline structure and had particle sizes ranging from 21 to 23 nm. The catalytic performance was evaluated by conducting multicomponent one-pot condensation reactions. Specif-ically, the condensation of 2-naphthol with aldehydes and dimedone was conducted to produce 12-aryl(alkyl)-8,9,10,12 tetrahydrobenzo [a]xanthen-11-one derivatives, and the condensation of 2-naphthol with aldehydes was performed to synthesize 14-aryl(alkyl)-14H-dibenzo [a,j]xanthene derivatives. The acidic sites of the catalyst were determined using pyridine FTIR spectroscopy. The studies revealed that this catalyst system exhibited excellent performance, resulting in high product yields (88-96%) and reduced reaction times (12-20 min). The catalyst demonstrated high catalytic activity, good reusability, and a simple preparation method, thereby showing promise for potential industrial-scale applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据