4.7 Article

Sparse decomposition enables adaptive and accurate Raman spectral denoising

期刊

TALANTA
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.125120

关键词

Raman spectra; Denoising methods of spectra; Sparse decomposition; Orthogonal matching pursuit; Signal reconstruction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an innovative adaptive sparse decomposition denoising (ASDD) method is proposed for enhancing the quality of spectral denoising in Raman spectroscopy. The ASDD method features a dictionary establishment, a dynamic dictionary construction technique, and the utilization of the orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm, which effectively improves the accuracy and robustness of denoising Raman spectra.
Enhancing the quality of spectral denoising plays a vital role in Raman spectroscopy. Nevertheless, the intricate nature of the noise, coupled with the existence of impurity peaks, poses significant challenges to achieving high accuracy while accommodating various Raman spectral types. In this study, an innovative adaptive sparse decomposition denoising (ASDD) method is proposed for denoising Raman spectra. This approach features several innovations. Firstly, a dictionary comprising spectral feature peaks is established from the input spectra by applying a chemometric feature extraction method, which better aligns with the original data compared to traditional dictionaries. Secondly, a dynamic Raman spectral dictionary construction technique is introduced to swiftly adapt to new substances, employing a limited amount of additional Raman spectral data. Thirdly, the orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm is utilized to sparsely decompose the Raman spectra onto the constructed dictionaries, effectively eliminating various random and background noises in the Raman spectra. Empirical results confirm that ASDD enhances the accuracy and robustness of denoising Raman spectra. Significantly, ASDD surpasses existing algorithms in processing Raman spectra of pesticide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据