4.6 Article

UO2 dissolution in bicarbonate solution with H2O2: the effect of temperature

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 13, 期 40, 页码 28021-28029

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ra08131h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of temperature on the oxidative dissolution of UO2 in bicarbonate solution. At higher bicarbonate concentrations, increasing temperature led to a decrease in dissolved U concentration, which was attributed to the formation of U-VI-bicarbonate species and a change in the mechanism of H2O2 decomposition from oxidative to catalytic. At lower bicarbonate concentrations, no obvious correlation between temperature and U dissolution was observed.
Upon nuclear waste canister failure and contact of spent nuclear fuel with groundwater, the UO2 matrix of spent fuel will interact with oxidants in the groundwater generated by water radiolysis. Bicarbonate (HCO3-) is often found in groundwater, and the H2O2 induced oxidative dissolution of UO2 in bicarbonate solution has previously been studied under various conditions. Temperatures in the repository at the time of canister failure will differ depending on the location, yet the effect of temperature on oxidative dissolution is unknown. To investigate, the decomposition rate of H2O2 at the UO2 surface and dissolution of U-VI in bicarbonate solution (0.1, 1, 10 and 50 mM) was analysed at various temperatures (10, 25, 45 and 60 ?). At [HCO3-] = 1 mM, the concentration of dissolved U-VI decreased with increasing temperature. This was attributed to the formation of U-VI-bicarbonate species at the surface and a change in the mechanism of H2O2 decomposition from oxidative to catalytic. At 0.1 mM, no obvious correlation between temperature and U dissolution was observed, and thermodynamic calculations indicated this was due to a change in the surface species. A pathway to explain the observed dissolution behaviour of UO2 in bicarbonate solution as a function of temperature was proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据