4.5 Article

Bioinformatic identification and experiment validation revealed that ACTG1 is a promising prognostic signature and therapeutic target for sepsis

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 114, 期 4, 页码 325-334

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jleuko/qiad072

关键词

ACTG1; bioinformatics; biomarker; RNA-Seq; sepsis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, RNA sequencing and gene coexpression network analysis were used to identify sepsis-related genes, and ACTG1 was identified as a central gene associated with sepsis prognosis. The results of this study suggest that high expression of ACTG1 is associated with poor prognosis in sepsis patients.
In the intensive care unit, sepsis is a prevalent clinical syndrome (i.e. the final pathway to death from most infections). Peripheral blood gene expression profiling is becoming more and more accepted as a potential diagnostic or prognostic tool. This work aimed to recognize genes related to sepsis, providing potential translational therapeutic targets. RNA sequencing was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 20 healthy control subjects and 51 sepsis patients. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis was employed to pick out sepsis-related and immunocyte-related gene modules. Genes in the yellow module are primarily involved in excessive inflammation and immune suppression. STRING and Cytoscape were combined to identify ACTG1 and IQGAP1 as hub genes with highest connective degree, and prognostic predication value of ACTG1 was confirmed. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out. ACTG1 messenger RNA expression was increased in animal and in cell-related sepsis models. Small interfering RNA revealed decreasing ACTG1 can reduce the in vitro sepsis model apoptosis. We have authenticated ACTG1 as a reliable signature of a poor outcome of sepsis and promising therapeutic targets for sepsis. The risk of death during sepsis increased with higher plasma ACTG1-induced apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据