4.5 Article

European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Report on Downstaging, Bridging and Immunotherapy in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

期刊

TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11648

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; liver transplantation; downstaging; bridging; immunotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver transplantation offers the best chance of cure for most non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Downstaging and bridging therapies, such as ablation and transarterial chemoembolization, can be used to lower the patient's condition and keep them within transplant criteria. Immunotherapy shows great potential in supporting downstaging and bridging therapies.
Liver transplantation offers the best chance of cure for most patients with non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although not all patients with HCC are eligible for liver transplantation at diagnosis, some can be downstaged using locoregional treatments such as ablation and transarterial chemoembolization. These aforementioned treatments are being applied as bridging therapies to keep patients within transplant criteria and to avoid them from dropping out of the waiting list while awaiting a liver transplant. Moreover, immunotherapy might have great potential to support downstaging and bridging therapies. To address the contemporary status of downstaging, bridging, and immunotherapy in liver transplantation for HCC, European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated working group comprised of experts in the treatment of HCC to review literature and to develop guidelines pertaining to this cause that were subsequently discussed and voted during the Transplant Learning Journey (TLJ) 3.0 Consensus Conference that took place in person in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the working group on Downstaging, Bridging and Immunotherapy in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma are presented in this article.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据