4.6 Article

Post-quantum secure group signature with verifier local revocation and backward unlinkability

期刊

COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2023.103782

关键词

Group signature; Verifier local revocation; Backward unlinkability; Post-quantum security; Lattice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new lattice-based group signature scheme that combines the timestamp with Verifier Local Revocation (VLR) using the complete tree technique. The scheme achieves post-quantum security, almost full anonymity, and traceability, as well as backward unlinkability and effectively reduces the size of the revocation list.
Group signature supports users to generate signatures on behalf of the group. Verifier local revocation (VLR) is an important method to revoke a misbehaving user in group signature, which has attracted many researchers' attention. However, the existing lattice-based group signature schemes with VLR either achieve only selfless anonymity, have revocation list of size linear with the number of revoked users, or suffer from the issue that signatures generated by revoked users could easily be linked by an adversary. Additionally, the development of quantum computing technology threatens the security of traditional cryptosystems. Therefore, in this paper we propose a new lattice-based group signature scheme, which makes use of the complete tree technique to combine the timestamp with VLR. It enjoys post-quantum security and satisfies almost full anonymity and traceability if the LWE and SIS problems are hard. Compared with previous schemes, our scheme achieves backward unlinkability additionally. Thanks to the revocation token update mechanism, a revocation token for time period t could not be connected with signatures generated in period t+ 1. Furthermore, the revocation list in our scheme only stores the tokens of users who have been revoked before the expiry, reducing the revocation list size effectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据