4.6 Article

A machine learning-based study of multifactor susceptibility and risk control of induced seismicity in unconventional reservoirs

期刊

PETROLEUM SCIENCE
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 2232-2243

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2023.02.0031995-8226

关键词

Induced seismicity; Hydraulic fracturing; Seismicity susceptibility; Risk control; Machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study collects a comprehensive dataset from 594 fracturing wells in the Duvernay Formation near Fox Creek, Alberta, to quantify the influences of various factors on hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity. Through an integrated machine learning investigation, the study identifies significant predictors and successfully guides fracturing job size to reduce seismicity risks. The findings contribute to mitigating potential seismicity risks in other seismicity frequent regions.
A comprehensive dataset from 594 fracturing wells throughout the Duvernay Formation near Fox Creek, Alberta, is collected to quantify the influences of geological, geomechanical, and operational features on the distribution and magnitude of hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity. An integrated machine learning-based investigation is conducted to systematically evaluate multiple factors that contribute to induced seismicity. Feature importance indicates that a distance to fault, a distance to basement, minimum principal stress, cumulative fluid injection, initial formation pressure, and the number of fracturing stages are among significant model predictors. Our seismicity prediction map matches the observed spatial seismicity, and the prediction model successfully guides the fracturing job size of a new well to reduce seismicity risks. This study can apply to mitigating potential seismicity risks in other seismicityfrequent regions. (c) 2023 The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据