4.8 Article

Interfacial Polymerization of Highly Active Thiolated Cyclodextrin for the Fabrication of a Loose Nanofiltration Membrane with a Chlorine-Resistant Poly(thioester) Linkage

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 15, 期 36, 页码 43193-43204

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c09390

关键词

interfacial polymerization; highly active thiolated beta-cyclodextrin; poly(thioester) linkage; loose nanofiltration; chlorine resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a highly active thiolated beta-cyclodextrin monomer was introduced to fabricate a dense and porous poly(thioester) linkage on a commercial membrane surface. The composite membrane exhibited superior separation performance and stability.
Cyclodextrins have been frequently used to fabricate membranes via interfacial polymerization (IP). However, the relatively low reactivity of pristine cyclodextrins often induces a lower cross-linking density and unsatisfactory separation performance. In this work, to introduce a highly active thiolated beta-cyclodextrin (CD-SH) monomer into IP progress, we constructed a dense and porous poly(thioester) linkage on a commercial membrane surface with loose nanofiltration by IP of CD-SH and trimesoyl trichloride (TMC) as the monomer in an aqueous phase and organic phase separately for the first time. Furthermore, the reactivity of CD-SH has been fully demonstrated by the two-phase IP aiming at unmodified beta-CD, a CD-SH/TMC freestanding membrane with a thicker interfacial layer and a smoother surface, and a PAN/CD-SH membrane with a narrow porous distribution. The composite membrane possessed superior separation performance for a high rejection (83.1-99.6%) of different anionic dyes and a low rejection (<20%) of salts, as well as a high-efficiency sieving ability of dye/dye and dye/salt mixtures. The membrane with a poly(thioester) selective layer could steadily operate in a long-term filtration test and exhibit great stability, chloride-resistance performance, and recyclability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据