4.7 Article

Concept of inverted refractive-index-contrast grating mirror and exemplary fabrication by 3D laser micro-printing

期刊

NANOPHOTONICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2023-0283

关键词

nanophotonics; polymer photonics; subwavelength grating; 3D laser lithography; 3D laser micro-printing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a compact, single-layer inverted refractive index-contrast grating (ICG) as an alternative to bulky multi-layered distributed Bragg reflectors. The ICG offers nearly total optical power reflectance and polarization discrimination, as well as phase tuning of the reflected and transmitted light.
Highly reflective mirrors are indispensable components in a variety of state-of-the-art photonic devices. Typically used, bulky, multi-layered distributed Bragg (DBR) reflectors are limited to lattice-matched semiconductors or nonconductive dielectrics. Here, we introduce an inverted refractive index-contrast grating (ICG) as compact, singlelayer alternative to DBR. In the ICG, a subwavelength onedimensional grating made of a low-refractive-index material is implemented on a high-refractive-index cladding. Our numerical simulations show that the ICG provides nearly total optical power reflectance for the light incident from the side of the cladding whenever the refractive index of the grating exceeds 1.75, irrespective of the refractive index of the cladding. Additionally, the ICG enables polarization discrimination and phase tuning of the reflected and transmitted light, the property not achievable with the DBR. We experimentally demonstrate a proof-of-concept ICG fabricated according to the proposed design, using the technique of sub-mu m 3D laser lithography in which thin stripes of IP-Dip photoresist are micro-printed on a Si cladding. This one-stepmethod avoids laborious and often destructive etching-based procedures for grating structuration, making it possible to implement the grating on any arbitrary cladding material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据