4.7 Article

Dynamic Economic Dispatch Problem Integrated With Demand Response (DEDDR) Considering Non-Linear Responsive Load Models

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 2586-2595

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2508779

关键词

Demand response; dynamic economic dispatch; DEDDR; incentive-based demand response programs (DRPs); non-linear responsive loads modelling; optimal incentive; random drift particle swarm optimization (RDPSO)

资金

  1. Iran Energy Efficiency Organization [93/270]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intelligent implementation of demand response programs (DRPs) not only decreases electricity price in electricity markets, but also improves network reliability. In this paper, the dynamic economic dispatch (DED) problem has been optimally integrated with the incentive-based DRPs. Moreover, mathematical load modeling can be so effective in the load curve estimation with the lowest error. So, economic models of the linear and non-linear responsive loads (power, exponential, and logarithmic) have been developed for time-based and incentive-based DRPs and integrated with DED. Also, a procedure to select the most conservative responsive load model for the load estimation has been presented too. Also, determining the optimal incentive in the incentive-based DRPs is one of the independent system operator's challenges. In the proposed combined model, the fuel cost is minimized and the optimal incentive is determined simultaneously. Valve-point loading effect, prohibited operating zones, spinning reserve requirements, and the other non-linear practical constraints make the combined problem into a complicated, non-linear, non-smooth, and non-convex optimization problem, which has been solved with a population-based meta-heuristic algorithm namely random drift particle swarm optimization algorithm. The proposed combined model is applied on a ten units test system. Results indicate the practical benefits of the proposed model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据