4.7 Article

Beef protein ingredients from fat rendering process are promising functional ingredients

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 433, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137298

关键词

Animal co-product; Beef protein; Collagen; Solubility; Gelation; Emulsification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The valorization of co-products is a promising approach to tackle the challenge of increasing global food resources and ensuring the sustainability of food systems. This study focused on characterizing two bovine co-products from the fat rendering process in terms of protein solubility, gelling, and emulsifying properties. The results showed that while the protein solubility of the ingredients was affected by ionic strength, it had little to no impact on their functionality. Similarly, pH had minimal effect on the functional properties. Overall, protein concentration was found to be the key parameter, indicating the potential easy utilization of these co-products in various food applications.
The valorization of co-products may be a promising way to meet the dual challenge of increasing global food resources and sustainability of food systems. In particular, meat co-products may be nutritionally interesting protein resources, if they offer functional properties in accordance with food applications. In that aim, two bovine co-products, resulting from the fat rendering process, have been characterized, regarding the protein solubility, gelling, and emulsifying properties. The effect of protein concentration, pH variation and NaCl addition on these properties was tested. Despite an effect of the ionic strength on the protein solubility of the two ingredients, a little or no significant impact was observed on the functionalities. Similarly, the functional properties were scarcely affected by pH. In the end, the protein concentration has proven to be the only important parameter, which points to an easy utilization of these ingredients in many food conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据