4.6 Article

Structure and energetics of hydrogen bonding networks in dilute HOD/H2O solutions confined in silica nanopores

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 3025-3038

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3en00291h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the hydrogen bonding behavior in nanpores and finds that hydrogen bonds are strengthened in the interfacial binding layers while weakened in the body of the nanopores. This contrasting trend in reactivity for water molecules in different locations could have significant implications.
Hydrogen-bonding (H-bonding) networks in liquid H2O define its reactivity and physico-chemical properties. In nanopores, H-bonding is not easily predictable due to the competing effects on water structure from the opposing surfaces. Here we explore H-bonding under nanoconfinement in silica nanopores. We use isotopically dilute deuterated water to exclude intermolecular oscillator coupling effects, and utilize temperature-controlled Raman spectroscopy, water sorption measurements, and molecular dynamics simulations to decipher H-bonding structures and energetics. We found two opposite trends for H-bonding under nanoconfinement: in the interfacial binding layers at the silica surfaces nanoconfinement increases H-bond strength, while in the body of the nanopore H-bond strength is decreased in comparison to bulk water. The existence of two populations of water in nanopores could lead to the contrasting reactivity trends under nanoconfinement for the chemical species residing near pore surfaces versus those residing in the middle of the pore. In the near-interfacial regions, strong H-bonding environments affect reactions involving charge transfer and solvation; alternatively, in the middle of the pore, weakened H-bonding interactions could decrease de-solvation costs and shift equilibrium constants. The observed H-bond weakening in SiO2 nanopore body may also indicate a decrease in the H2O liquid-vapor phase transition temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据