4.7 Article

Global value chains and economic complexity index: Evidence from generalized panel quantile regression

期刊

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 347-365

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.08.003

关键词

Global value chain; Economic complexity; Backward participation; Forward participation; Generalized quantile regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the impact of global value chains (GVCs) participation on economic complexity for a sample of underdeveloped, moderately developed, and developed countries. It finds that GVCs participation has adverse effects on economic complexity, except for countries with higher economic complexity. Moreover, forward participation is negatively associated with economic complexity, while backward participation has a positive impact on economic complexity in more complex economies.
This paper investigates the impact of global value chains (GVCs) participation on economic complexity for a sample of underdeveloped, moderately developed, and developed countries which includes 42 economies from 2000 to 2018. Our empirical analysis finds that the influence of GVC participation on economic complexity varies across quantiles as it has adverse and significant effects on economic complexity in the first five lower quantiles (5th - 25th). It indicates that GVC participation has adverse impacts on economic complexity except for the economy with higher economic complexity. Moreover, forward participation is negatively associated with economic complexity in all the quantiles except for the 90th quantile. In countries with lower and moderate economic complexity, forward participation has a negative impact on how complex the economy is. Alongside, backward participation has positive and significant impacts on economic complexity in the 85th, 90th, and 95th quantiles implying that in a more complex economy, backward participation is positively correlated with economic complexity. (C) 2023 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据