4.5 Article

Dynamic risk score modeling for multiple longitudinal risk factors and survival

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2023.107837

关键词

Time-dependent covariates; Longitudinal risk score; Dynamic prediction; Competing risks; Joint model; Pediatric acute liver failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modeling disease risk and survival using longitudinal risk factor trajectories can provide personalized information for clinical decision making. This study proposes a dynamic risk score modeling framework that can accommodate multiple longitudinal risk factors and dependent censoring, and generate parsimonious longitudinal risk scores. The proposed method demonstrates satisfactory performance in simulation studies and real-world application.
Modeling disease risk and survival using longitudinal risk factor trajectories is of interest in various clinical scenarios. The capacity to build a prognostic model using the trajectories of multiple longitudinal risk factors, in the presence of potential dependent censoring, would enable more informed, personalized decision making. A dynamic risk score modeling framework is proposed for multiple longitudinal risk factors and survival in the presence of dependent censoring, where both events depend on participants' post-baseline clinical progression and form a competing risks structure. The model requires relatively few random effects regardless of the number of longitudinal risk factors and can therefore accommodate multiple longitudinal risk factors in a parsimonious manner. The proposed method performed satisfactorily in extensive simulation studies. It is further applied to the motivating registry study on pediatric acute liver failure to model death using the trajectories of multiple clinical and biochemical markers. Once established, the model yields an easily calculable longitudinal risk score that can be used for disease monitoring among future patients.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据