4.7 Article

A mathematical model for ammonium removal and recovery from real municipal wastewater using a natural zeolite

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.110833

关键词

Sorption-desorption; Breakthrough curve; Cation exchange; Dynamic modeling; Mass transfer modeling; Wastewater treatment effluent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted experiments using natural clinoptilolite zeolite (NZ) to investigate the sorption and desorption processes of ammonium (NH4+) in residual effluents. The results showed that NZ had good sorption and desorption capabilities for NH4+ removal and recovery. The study has practical significance for effective treatment of wastewater containing ammonium.
A study was carried out to remove/recover ammonium (NH4+) from residual effluents in tertiary treatment by sorption/desorption processes onto a natural clinoptilolite zeolite (NZ) in batch and fixed-bed column systems. Batch equilibrium and kinetic experiments were performed at different loading of NZ and contact time intervals, respectively. The results obtained in batch were fitted by the Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms and mass action law model. The Freundlich isotherm showed better agreement with experimental data than the Langmuir model. The isotherm studies revealed a type III with a maximum capacity of 2.8 +/- 0.2 mg/g at 40 mgNH4+/L. Moreover, the data from the fixed-bed column studies was well fitted by a mass transfer model, considering the intraparticle diffusion resistance given by the linear driving force model (LDF). Finally, the capacity of NH+4 recovery of activated zeolite was measured experimentally and by a robust dynamic desorption model. The column desorption results demonstrated that higher recoveries (92-99.99%) were observed when increasing the flow rate to 0.12 mL/min. The uniqueness of this study is its capability to simulate both the sorption and desorption processes of the naturally derived sorbent for the effective removal and recovery of NH4+-N from real wastewater stream.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据