4.6 Article

Molecular simulation of the effect of dioctyl phthalate on the properties of nitrile rubber

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106983

关键词

Dioctyl phthalate; Nitrile rubber; Mechanical properties; Plasticization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanical and tribological properties of pure NBR and DOP/NBR composite materials with different mass ratios were studied using molecular dynamics simulations. The results showed that DOP plasticization of NBR increased the mobility and flexibility of the material, and reduced intermolecular interaction forces.
The mechanical and tribological properties of pure nitrile rubber (NBR) and dioctyl phthalate/nitrile rubber (DOP/NBR) composite materials with mass ratios of 5/95, 10/90, 15/85, 20/80, 25/75, and 30/70 were studied through molecular dynamics simulations at the molecular level. The root mean square displacement (RMSD) and gyration radius of the composite materials were investigated to explore the mechanism of DOP plasticizing NBR. Different models of pure NBR and DOP/NBR composite materials with different mass ratios were established, and the mechanical properties of the materials were calculated by using the constant strain method. The tribological properties of the materials were studied by applying shear velocity on the surface of the materials. The research results showed that the shear resistance of the DOP/NBR composite material increased and then decreased with the increase of the DOP mass ratio, and the same pattern was observed for the shear modulus. Compared with pure NBR materials, DOP/NBR composite materials demonstrated better mobility and flexibility, and the RMSD and gyration radius of the material increased and then decreased with the increase of the DOP mass ratio. The DOP plasticization of NBR reduced the intermolecular interaction forces and changed the molecular conformation, increasing the softness and plasticity of the polymer chains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据