4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of CeO2/MgFe2O4 nanocomposites for electrochemical study and their cytotoxicity in normal human dermal fibroblast (HDF) and human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cell lines

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 968, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171932

关键词

Nanoparticles; G-factor; Supercapacitors; Cytotoxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of size variation in CeO2/MgFe2O4 nanocomposites on their electrochemical performance and cytotoxicity. The nanocomposites were synthesized using a combustion process and different calcined temperatures to adjust the particle size. The results show that the nanocomposites exhibit good biocompatibility and favorable electrochemical performance, suggesting their potential for biological applications.
In this study, we investigated the effect of size variation in CeO2/MgFe2O4 nanocomposites (NCs) on their electrochemical (EC) performance and cytotoxicity. To adjust particle size, the NCs were synthesized using an auto-combustion process and subsequently at various (500, 600, 700, and 800 degrees C) calcined temperatures (CTs). The crystallite size was determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD), and the NCs spherical shape was validated using field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The chemical components on the surface of the NCs were discovered using an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The different size distributions of CeO2/MgFe2O4 NCs as electroactive materials in supercapacitors and measured their EC performance in 1 M KOH using cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The CeO2/MgFe2O4 NCs revealed a good cell survival rate in cytotoxicity studies, showing their biocompatibility. The NCs were found to be harmless to HDF and MDAMB-231 cancer cell lines, highlighting their potential for biological applications in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据