4.5 Article

Numerical investigation on dynamic response of the screen mesh in vibrating screening through DEM-FEM co-simulation

期刊

PARTICUOLOGY
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 205-217

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2023.08.013

关键词

Vibrating screen; Dynamic response; DEM-FEM; Screening parameters; Local vibration amplitude

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the dynamic response of the screen mesh in vibrating screen design was studied using the DEM-FEM co-simulation method. The effect of screening parameters on the dynamic response was explored, and the mechanism was revealed on the particle level. The results showed that the screening parameters can greatly affect the LVA of the screen mesh and its distribution, providing an important basis for optimal design.
Dynamic response of the screen mesh is of great significance in the optimum vibrating screen design. In this paper, based on the DEM-FEM co-simulation method, the effect of screening parameters on the dynamic response of the screen mesh is explored and the mechanism is revealed on the particle level. Firstly, a virtual experiment on a linear vibrating screen was carried out to analyze the screening parameters' effect with both impact load and sustained stress inflicted on the screen mesh. Then, the time-domain evolution regularity of the screen mesh LVA (Local Vibration Amplitude) under different particle plugging conditions was investigated based on the co-simulation. Finally, the influence of screening parameters on LVA and its distribution was discussed. The results show that the screening parameters can greatly affect the screen mesh LVA and its distribution by changing the movement of the granular material and the particle penetration probability, which provides an important basis for the optimal design of the screen mesh and its supporting structure.(c) 2023 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据