4.7 Article

Constrained Bayesian optimization algorithms for estimating design points in structural reliability analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109613

关键词

Bayesian optimization; Design point; Acquisition function; Gaussian process regression; Feasible regions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estimating design points accurately is crucial for reliability analysis and reliability-based design optimization. This research proposes two acquisition functions and develops a Constrained Bayesian Optimization method for actively learning high accuracy and globally converging design points. Additionally, an improved algorithm is introduced for adaptively learning design points far away from the origin.
Estimating the design points with high accuracy is a historical and key issue for many reliability analysis and reliability-based design optimization methods. Indeed, it is still a challenge especially when the limit state functions (LSFs) show highly nonlinear behaviors, and/or the reliability index is large, and/or the gradients of LSF are not available. To fill the above gap, two acquisition functions incorporating both the objective function and constraints are devised, and based on which, a Constrained Bayesian Optimization (ConBayOpt) method is firstly developed for actively learning the design points with high accuracy and global convergence. Further, an improved algorithm, called Constrained Bayesian Subset Optimization (ConBaySubOpt) is devised for adaptively learning the design points far away from the origin of the standard normal space. Similar to subset simulation, the ConBaySubOpt algorithm automatically produces a set of intermediate failure surfaces and feasible regions for approaching the true design point, but does not require Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation for conditional sampling. The efficiency, accuracy and wide applicability of the proposed methods are demonstrated with two test examples and three engineering examples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据