4.2 Article

Statistical temporal pattern extraction by neuronal architecture

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033177

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates a simple biologically inspired feedforward neuronal model that utilizes higher-order temporal fluctuations for information extraction in time series classification. By training synaptic weights and a non-linear gain function, the study reveals how nonlinearity allows for the transfer of higher-order correlations and maximization of classification accuracy. The experimental results highlight the advantage of the biologically inspired architecture in utilizing the number of trainable parameters compared to classical machine learning approaches.
Neuronal systems need to process temporal signals. Here, we show how higher-order temporal (co)fluctuations can be employed to represent and process information. Concretely, we demonstrate that a simple biologically inspired feedforward neuronal model can extract information from up to the third-order cumulant to perform time series classification. This model relies on a weighted linear summation of synaptic inputs followed by a nonlinear gain function. Training both the synaptic weights and the nonlinear gain function exposes how the nonlinearity allows for the transfer of higher-order correlations to the mean, which in turn enables the synergistic use of information encoded in multiple cumulants to maximize the classification accuracy. The approach is demonstrated both on synthetic and real-world datasets of multivariate time series. Moreover, we show that the biologically inspired architecture makes better use of the number of trainable parameters than a classical machine-learning scheme. Our findings emphasize the benefit of biological neuronal architectures, paired with dedicated learning algorithms, for the processing of information embedded in higher-order statistical cumulants of temporal (co)fluctuations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据