4.7 Article

Retail gasoline pricing in a subsidized energy market: An empirical analysis from AIDS model for Iran

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113812

关键词

Gasoline pricing; Consumption tax; Energy subsidy reform; Almost ideal demand system (AIDS) model; Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevailing fixed-price gasoline pricing policy in Iran has resulted in excessive energy consumption, fuel smuggling, and environmental concerns. To address these issues, a new gasoline pricing policy is proposed that takes into account socio-economic factors. The study categorizes gasoline consumption into different groups and suggests avoiding price increases for groups consuming below 80 L per month to prevent social unrest. Additionally, a tax rate of 5% is recommended for consumption above the current ration.
The prevailing gasoline pricing policy in Iran has traditionally been the fixed-price policy, where both rationed and non-rationed prices are set below the free-market prices. This long-standing subsidy policy has led to excessive energy consumption, fuel smuggling, and environmental concerns. However, efforts to reform these subsidies have faced social unrest due to abrupt price increases. To address these issues, we propose a new gasoline pricing policy that incorporates socio-economic factors using the AIDS model. We have categorized gasoline consumption into four groups: less than 60 L (current ration), 60 L-80 L, 80 L-120 L, and more than 120 L per month. Results shows that the price elasticity for the 60 L-80 L group is the highest (-0.94), while it is lowest for the above 120 L group (-0.48). Therefore, we recommend avoiding price increases for groups consuming below 80 L per month to prevent social unrest. Also, we suggest implementing a tax rate of 5% for consumption above the current ration. Under the proposed policy, the non-rationed price of gasoline will vary between the ration price and the Persian Gulf FOB price, depending on consumption levels. This approach ensures that higher levels of gasoline consumption will be associated with fewer subsidies and welfare benefits, and vice versa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据