4.7 Review

Nano-clay modified membranes: A promising green strategy for microalgal antifouling filtration

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 902, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166479

关键词

Microalgal harvesting; Filtration; Membranes; Nano-clays; Antifouling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane fouling is a major challenge that hinders the sustainable application of membrane filtration-based microalgal harvesting at the industrial level. This review explores the potential of using nano-clay fillers for membrane surface modification to improve membrane performance and anti-fouling properties. Strategies for better incorporation of nano-clay in the polymer matrix of the membrane are summarized, and factors affecting membrane fouling are discussed in depth.
Membrane fouling is a major challenge which limits the sustainable application of membrane filtration-based microalgal harvesting at industrial level. Membrane fouling leads to increased operational and maintenance costs and represents a major obstacle to microalgal downstream processing. Nano-clays are promising naturally occurring nanoparticles in membrane fabrication due to their low-cost, facile preparation, and their superior properties in terms of surface hydrophilicity, mechanical stability, and resistance against chemicals. The membrane surface modification using nano-clays is a sustainable promising approach to improve membranes mechanical properties and their fouling resistance. However, the positive effects of nano-clay particles on membrane fouling are often limited by aggregation and poor adhesion to the base polymeric matrix. This review surveys the recent efforts to achieve anti-fouling behavior using membrane surface modification with nano-clay fillers. Further, strategies to achieve a better incorporation of nano-clay in the polymer matrix of the membrane are summarised, and the factors that govern the membrane fouling, stability, adhesion, agglomeration and leaching are discussed in depth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据