4.7 Article

Graph embedding deep broad learning system for data imbalance fault diagnosis of rotating machinery

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109601

关键词

Graph embedding; Broad learning system; Autoencoder; Data imbalance; Intelligent fault diagnosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

“This paper proposes a graph embedding based deep broad learning system (GEDBLS) for addressing the problem of imbalanced data fault diagnosis in rotating machinery. GEDBLS utilizes category and structure information for reconstruction and learns high-level abstract features of vibration signals through a progressive encoding and decoding mechanism. Additionally, GEDBLS considers category weights and intra-class tightness for imbalanced data classification.”
The distribution of monitored data during the service life of machinery equipment is imbalanced, especially there is more monitoring data for health conditions than for failure conditions. Unfortunately, most existing intelligent fault diagnosis methods are built on the assumption of data balance and cannot effectively handle unbalanced data. Therefore, to solve the above problem, a graph embedding based deep broad learning system (GEDBLS) for data imbalance fault diagnosis of rotating machinery is proposed in this paper. Different from the traditional broad learning system (BLS), the designed GEDBLS not only utilizes the category and structure information of the data in the reconstruction process, but also allows learning the high-level abstract features of the vibration signal through a progressive encoding and decoding mechanism. In addition, GEDBLS considers category weights and intra-class tightness in the classification loss function for imbalanced data category classification. The effectiveness of the presented approach is verified via monitoring data from key equipment of rotating machinery. Experimental results indicate that compared with other methods, the proposed method has stronger ability of feature representation and imbalanced data processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据