4.6 Article

Enhanced pseudocapacitive behaviour in laser-written graphene micro-supercapacitors decorated with nickel cobalt sulphide nanoparticles

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2023.112490

关键词

Laser-induced graphene; Microsupercapacitor; Nickel cobalt sulfide; Energy storage; Polyimide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates an enhanced fabrication technique using CO2 infrared lasers to pattern micro-supercapacitor electrodes. The direct-written laser-induced graphene (LIG) micro-supercapacitors with NiCo2S4 nanoparticles exhibited outstanding properties, including high specific capacitance and energy density, as well as excellent capacitance retention and flexibility. These findings suggest the potential use of LIG/NiCo2S4 MSC in the next generation of flexible and miniaturized portable devices.
The next generation of energy storage technologies requires enhanced fabrication techniques such as the use of CO2 infrared lasers to pattern micro-supercapacitor (MSC) electrodoes. This study reports direct-writen laser-induced graphene (LIG) micro-supercapacitors with electrodepositated NiCo2S4- nanoparticles on commercial polyimide sheets. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) combined with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed NiCo2S4 nanoparticles decorating the graphene, within a highly porous carbon-based electrode. The LIG/NiCo2S4 exhibited outstanding properties with a specific capacitance of 30.4 mF cm(-2) at 0.75 mA cm(-2) and an energy density of 16.9 mu Wh cm(-2) at a power density of 367.5 mu W cm(-2). High capacitance retention of 1.22-fold was measured after 5000 cycles of charge/discharge, and of similar to 90% when bent to 120 degrees angle. Here, it is demonstrated that surface decoration is an effective route in improving LIG MSC storage properties, and that the LIG/NiCo2S4 MSC is suitable for use in next generation of flexible and miniaturized portable devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据