4.7 Article

Dynamic recrystallization nanoarchitectonics of FeCrCuMnNi multi-phase high entropy alloy

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 968, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172001

关键词

High entropy alloy; Hot deformation; Dynamic recrystallization; Microstructure; Texture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamic recrystallization behavior of FeCrCuMnNi high entropy alloy was investigated, and it was found that dDRX mechanism was the dominant mechanism during hot deformation, bulging was an effective mechanism for inducing new recrystallized nuclei, and grain growth was slower compared to conventional alloys. This behavior was attributed to continuous nucleation, slow diffusion, high solution hardening characteristics of high entropy alloys, and the presence of multiple phases.
Dynamic recrystallization behavior of the FeCrCuMnNi high entropy alloy (HEA) was investigated through hot compression test at different temperatures and at constant strain rate. The results revealed that during hot deformation of FeCrCuMnNi HEA, flow stress and work hardening rate rapidly decreased with increasing the deformation temperature. Discontinuous dynamic recrystallization (dDRX) was found to be the main active mechanism during hot deformation, which was the governing mechanism even at higher temperatures. In addition, bulging was an effective mechanism for inducing new recrystallized nuclei. Grain growth was occurred at slow strain rate in comparison to conventional alloys and other HEAs. This behavior was attributed to the continuous nucleation during dDRX, sluggish diffusion, high solution hardening characteristics of HEAs, and the presence of multiple phases in the FeCrCuMnNi HEA. Texture analysis showed that at lower temperatures, deformation texture including < 110 > // CA fiber was formed. By increasing the deformation temperature, the formation of recrystallization texture fibers such as < 100 > // CA and < 211 > // CA rapidly intensified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据