4.6 Article

Iron-heme-Bach1 axis is involved in erythroblast adaptation to iron deficiency

期刊

HAEMATOLOGICA
卷 102, 期 3, 页码 454-465

出版社

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.151043

关键词

-

资金

  1. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  2. Takeda Foundation
  3. Astellas Foundation
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15H02506, 24390066, 25670156, 23116003, 21249014, 26293225]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25670156, 15H02506, 24390066, 26293225, 21249014] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron plays the central role in oxygen transport by erythrocytes as a constituent of heme and hemoglobin. The importance of iron and heme is also to be found in their regulatory roles during erythroblast maturation. The transcription factor Bach1 may be involved in their regulatory roles since it is deactivated by direct binding of heme. To address whether Bach1 is involved in the responses of erythroblasts to iron status, low iron conditions that induced severe iron deficiency in mice were established. Under iron deficiency, extensive gene expression changes and mitophagy disorder were induced during maturation of erythroblasts. Bach1(-/-) mice showed more severe iron deficiency anemia in the developmental phase of mice and a retarded recovery once iron was replenished when compared with wild-type mice. In the absence of Bach1, the expression of globin genes and Hmox1 (encoding heme oxygenase-1) was de-repressed in erythroblasts under iron deficiency, suggesting that Bach1 represses these genes in erythroblasts under iron deficiency to balance the levels of heme and globin. Moreover, an increase in genome-wide DNA methylation was observed in erythroblasts of Bach1(-/-) mice under iron deficiency. These findings reveal the principle role of iron as a regulator of gene expression in erythroblast maturation and suggest that the iron-hemeBach1 axis is important for a proper adaptation of erythroblast to iron deficiency to avoid toxic aggregates of non-heme globin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据