4.8 Article

A Semi-Supervised Failure Knowledge Graph Construction Method for Decision Support in Operations and Maintenance

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2023.3299078

关键词

Maintenance engineering; Knowledge graphs; Semantics; Feature extraction; Data mining; Bit error rate; Taxonomy; Knowledge graph; operation and maintenance; unstructured maintenance logs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a novel semi-supervised method for constructing failure knowledge graphs based on maintenance logs. The method extracts hidden contextual information from maintenance records and constructs failure items and their relationships to provide decision support. The feasibility and superiority of the method are validated using real wind farm data.
Maintenance logs of industrial equipment record descriptive and unstructured operation and maintenance (O&M) information, which is the basis of reliability, availability, and maintainability investigations. However, the construction of failure knowledge graphs as a basis for understanding the failure and maintenance properties of systems is challenging due to the requirement of annotation efforts and domain knowledge. This article proposes a novel semi-supervised method for failure knowledge graph construction. Initially, a semantic module is proposed to extract hidden contextual information from maintenance records and identify corresponding failure modes. The semantic module is trained by unlabeled maintenance records with the assistance of the hard pseudo-label acquisition and the proposed self-training algorithm. Subsequently, a taxonomy induction module is presented to extract failure items and their relationships to construct failure knowledge graphs that provide decision support. The feasibility and superiority of the proposed method are validated by maintenance logs from real wind farms. Overall, the proposed method provides an effective tool for semantic information digitalization of well-cumulated industrial O&M data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据