4.4 Article

Early cumulus cell removal increases cumulative live birth rate while having no negative effect on the malformation rate in in vitro fertilization: a propensity score-matched cohort study

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07212-4

关键词

Early cumulus cell removal; In vitro fertilization; Cumulative live birth rate; Malformation rate; Cumulative pregnancy rate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of early cumulus cell removal during human in vitro fertilization (IVF). The retrospective analysis of 1131 couples revealed that early cumulus cell removal was associated with a higher cumulative live birth rate and cumulative pregnancy rate, without any negative effects on the neonatal malformation rate.
PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of early cumulus cell removal (ECCR) during human in vitro fertilization (IVF).MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed between January 2011 and December 2019. The study enrolled 1131 couples who underwent IVF treatment with ECCR. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 1131 couples who underwent overnight coincubation of gametes were selected. The main outcome measure was the cumulative live birth rate. Secondary outcome measures included the cumulative pregnancy rate, polyspermy rate, available embryo rate, miscarriage rate, malformation rate, time to live birth, and oocyte-to-baby rate.ResultsThere were no significant differences found between the two groups in the polyspermy rate, available embryo rate, miscarriage rate, time to live birth, oocyte-to-baby rate, and neonatal congenital anomalies rate. The results of the study showed that ECCR was associated with a significantly higher cumulative live birth rate and cumulative pregnancy rate, along with a significantly lower fertilization rate.ConclusionsECCR tended to confer increased cumulative live birth rate and had no negative effect on the neonatal malformation rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据