4.6 Article

Nanoarchitected graphene/copper oxide nanoparticles/MoS2 ternary thin films as highly efficient electrodes for aqueous sodium-ion batteries

期刊

MATERIALS HORIZONS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 5521-5537

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3mh00982c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes an ingenious strategy to prepare tri-component nanoarchitected thin films, comprising graphene, molybdenum sulphide, and copper oxide nanoparticles, using the liquid-liquid interfacial route. The results demonstrate that these films exhibit superior performance as anodes in aqueous sodium-ion batteries, with high capacity values and excellent recovery rates.
Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) operating in aqueous electrolyte are an emerging technology that promises to be safer, cheaper, more sustainable and more efficient than their lithium-based counterparts. One of the great challenges associated with this technology is the development of advanced materials with high specific capacity to be used as electrodes. Herein, we describe an ingenious strategy to prepare unprecedented tri-component nanoarchitected thin films with superior performance when applied as anodes in aqueous SIBs. Taking advantage of the broadness and versatility of the liquid-liquid interfacial route, three transparent nanocomposite films comprising graphene, molybdenum sulphide and copper oxide nanoparticles have been prepared. The samples were characterized using several techniques, and the results demonstrated that depending on the specific experimental strategy, different nanoarchitectures are achieved, resulting in different and improved properties. An astonishing capacity of 1377 mA h g(-1) at 0.1 A g(-1) and a degree of recovery of 100% were observed for the film in which the interactions among the components were optimized. This is among the highest capacity values reported in the literature and demonstrates the potential of these tri-component materials to be used as anodes in aqueous sodium-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据