4.7 Article

Comparative Transcriptomics of Strawberries (Fragaria spp.) Provides Insights into Evolutionary Patterns

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01839

关键词

Fragaria; transcriptome; evolutionary pattern; comparative genomics; positive selection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31300201, 31590820, 31590823]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2014AA020528]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple closely related species with genomic sequences provide an ideal system for studies on comparative and evolutionary genomics, as well as the mechanism of speciation. The whole genome sequences of six strawberry species (Fragaria spp.) have been released, which provide one of the richest genomic resources of any plant genus. In this study, we first generated seven transcriptome sequences of Fragaria species de novo, with a total of 48,557-82,537 unigenes per species. Combined with 13 other species genomes in Rosales, we reconstructed a phylogenetic tree at the genomic level. The phylogenic tree shows that Fragaria closed grouped with Rubus and the Fragaria Glade is divided into three subclades. East Asian species appeared in every subclade, suggesting that the genus originated in this area at 7.99 Mya. Four species found in mountains of Southwest China originated at 3.98 Mya, suggesting that rapid speciation occurred to adapt to changing environments following the uplift of the Qinghai Tibet Plateau. Moreover, we identified 510 very significantly positively selected genes in the cultivated species F. x ananassa genome. This set of genes was enriched in functions related to specific agronomic traits, such as carbon metabolism and plant hormone signal transduction processes, which are directly related to fruit quality and flavor. These findings illustrate comprehensive evolutionary patterns in Fragaria and the genetic basis of fruit domestication of cultivated strawberry at the genomic/transcriptomic level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据