4.7 Article

Ratcheting strain accumulation of 3D-printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene-graphene composites

期刊

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107648

关键词

Ratcheting strain; 3D-printing; Graphene nanoplatelets; ABS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the ratcheting response of ABS polymer reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets in its filament and 3D-printed forms. The results show that adding a suitable amount of GNPs can increase the fatigue life and reduce the strain ratcheting accumulation of the filament. The ratcheting behavior of the 3D-printed parts is influenced by various factors.
This study aims to examine the ratcheting response of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) polymer reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) in its filament and 3D-printed forms. Combined chemical solution and melting compounding technique was used to fabricate the composite filaments through the use of a twin-screw extruder. In terms of filament nanocomposites, the effects of varying in GNP weight percentages was studied on the ratcheting response of the samples undergoing cyclic loads with the stress ratio of R = 0. Results revealed that filaments containing 0.5 wt% GNPs experienced the highest fatigue life and lowest strain ratcheting accumulation as compared to pure ABS filament and those with GNPs at 0.1 and 1.0 wt %. Observations revealed that the 3D-printed parts exhibited more complex ratcheting behaviour, wherein the interaction of printing process parameters including raster orientation and nozzle diameter along with factors such as GNP contents simultaneously influenced the fatigue and ratcheting behaviour of the printed specimens. Selecting the appropriate amount of nanofillers, along with the optimum printing process parameters, not only can increase the fatigue life of a 3D-printed samples, but can also substantially reduce the ratcheting strain accumulation values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据