4.7 Article

Ti doped Cr2O3 thin films: Atomic layer deposition, mechanical and optical properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 968, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172041

关键词

Thin films; Atomic layer deposition; Mechanical properties; Nanoindentation; Optical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the ALD deposition of titanium doped chromium oxide (CTO) films and found that CTO films contained alpha-Cr2O3 eskolaite phase when deposited at Ti/(Ti+Cr) atomic ratio values of 0-0.24. The growth rate of Ti-O on chromium oxide was significantly higher than that on TiO2, and the Ti amount had only a minor influence on the growth rate of chromium oxide. The doping of chromium oxide with titanium increased the hardness value of the films and enhanced their absorbance in the wavelength range of 350 - 450 nm.
Atomic layer deposition (ALD) of titanium doped chromium oxide (CTO) films on Si (100) and SiO2 substrates was studied using deposition formula of nx (CrO2Cl2 - CH3OH) + m x (TiCl4 - H2O). The CTO films contained alpha-Cr2O3 eskolaite phase when deposited at Ti/(Ti+Cr) atomic ratio values of 0-0.24. During the first ALD super cycle, the growth rate of the Ti-O on chromium oxide was 2.4 times higher compared to that on TiO2 and was explained by the differences of densities of oxygen atoms on the (001) plane of eskolaite compared to their density on (001) plane of anatase. At the same time only minor influence on the growth rate of chromium oxide depending on the Ti amount was detected. The hardness value of 20.5 GPa was obtained for CTO films at Ti/ (Ti+Cr) atomic ratio of 0.24, higher than 14.8 and 12.2 GPa obtained for pure chromium and titanium oxide thin films, respectively. The doping of the chromium oxide with titanium increased the absorbance of the films in the wavelength range of 350 - 450 nm and decreased the band gap energy corresponding to the indirect transition from 3.0 eV for pure Cr2O3 to 2.2 eV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据