4.7 Article

Effect of temperature on the degradation of glyphosate by Mn-oxide: Products and pathways of degradation

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 461, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132467

关键词

Aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA); Glycine; Orthophosphate; Birnessite; Degradation preference; Free energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigates the degradation of glyphosate and finds temperature-dependent preferences for the reaction pathways. Glycine pathway becomes more preferred as reaction time and temperature increase. The findings suggest possible ways to bias glyphosate degradation towards safer products and reducing overall environmental toxicity.
Glyphosate is the most commonly used herbicide in the United States. In the environment, glyphosate residues can either degrade into more toxic and persistent byproducts such as aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) or environmentally benign species such as sarcosine or glycine. In this research, the birnessite-catalyzed degradation of glyphosate was studied under environmentally relevant temperatures (10-40 degrees C) using high-performance liquid chromatography, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, and theoretical calculations. Our results show a temperature-dependent degradation pathway preference for AMPA and glycine production. The AMPA and glycine pathways are competitive at short reaction times, but the glycine pathway became increasingly preferred as reaction time and temperature increased. The measured free energy barriers are comparable for both the glycine and AMPA pathways (93.5 kJ mol- 1 for glycine and 97.1 kJ mol- 1 for AMPA); however, the entropic energy penalty for the AMPA pathway is significantly greater than the glycine pathway (-T Delta S double dagger= 26.2 and 42.8 kJ mol- 1 for glycine and AMPA, respectively). These findings provide possible routes for biasing glyphosate degradation towards safer products, thus to decrease the overall environmental toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据