4.5 Review

Path integrals, particular kinds, and strange things

期刊

PHYSICS OF LIFE REVIEWS
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 35-62

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.08.016

关键词

Self-organisation; Variational inference; Bayesian; Markov blanket; Active matter; Path integral

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a path integral formulation of the free energy principle to describe the trajectories of particles over time. By employing the principle of least action, it is possible to simulate the behavior of particles in exchange with their external environment. The paper discusses various types of particles and their different levels of inference or sentience.
This paper describes a path integral formulation of the free energy principle. The ensuing account expresses the paths or trajectories that a particle takes as it evolves over time. The main results are a method or principle of least action that can be used to emulate the behaviour of particles in open exchange with their external milieu. Particles are defined by a particular partition, in which internal states are individuated from external states by active and sensory blanket states. The variational principle at hand allows one to interpret internal dynamics-of certain kinds of particles-as inferring external states that are hidden behind blanket states. We consider different kinds of particles, and to what extent they can be imbued with an elementary form of inference or sentience. Specifically, we consider the distinction between dissipative and conservative particles, inert and active particles and, finally, ordinary and strange particles. Strange particles can be described as inferring their own actions, endowing them with apparent autonomy or agency. In short-of the kinds of particles afforded by a particular partition-strange kinds may be apt for describing sentient behaviour. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons .org /licenses /by /4 .0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据