4.7 Article

Doxorubicin-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres prepared using the solid-in-oil-in-water method for the transarterial chemoembolization of a liver tumor

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 305-312

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.05.037

关键词

Doxorubicin hydrochloride; Liver tumor; Microsphere; PLGA; Transarterial chemoembolization

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korean government (MSIP) [NRF-2012R1A1A1038944, NRF-2013R1A1A2A10011007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres (MSs) were fabricated using the solid-in-oil-in-water (S/O/W) emulsification method for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of a liver tumor. DOX-loaded PLGA MSs with a mean diameter of 26 mu m and a spherical shape were prepared. The biodegradation of PLGA MSs was observed in serum using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Drug release from the PLGA MSs was accelerated at an acidic pH (pH 5.5) compared to a normal physiological pH (pH 7.4). According to the results of a pharmacokinetic study in rats, the area under the curve (AUC) value of a drug, which indicates the systemic exposure extent of the drug, of the PLGA MSs group was 29.9% of that of a hepatic arterial injection (HAI) group. The DOX concentration ratio for liver tumors compared to normal livers was significantly higher in the PLGA MSs group than that of the HAI group (p< 0.05). After the TACE procedure was performed with DOX-PLGA MSs in a rat hepatoma model, the mean size increment of tumor in DOX-PLGA MSs group was found to be lower than that of the HAI group, and the viable portion of the DOX-PLGA MSs group was less than the other groups (p< 0.05). All these findings suggested that the developed DOX-loaded PLGA MSs fabricated with the S/O/W method can be used as a promising drug delivery system in TACE for liver tumors. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据