4.0 Article

The carbohydrate-deficient transferrin as a marker of chronic alcohol consumption and assessment of its usefulness in patients with cardiovascular diseases - a pilot study

期刊

出版社

POLISH ACAD SCIENCES, INST IMMUNOL & EXP THERAPY
DOI: 10.2478/ahem-2023-0010

关键词

carbohydrate deficient transferrin CDT%; GGT (Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase); alcohol abuse; asialotransferrin; disialotransferrin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the diagnostic value of CDT compared with other biomarkers in patients with heart failure. The results showed no significant correlations between CDT and troponin T or NT pro-BNP.
Introduction Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death in the world. The dose of 60 g of alcohol / day has been estimated to significantly increase the risk of developing high blood pressure, arrhythmias, hemorrhagic stroke, and cardiomyopathy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of CDT when compared with gammaglutamyltransferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), N-terminal fragment brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) and troponin T biomarkers in patients with heart failure.Materials and Methods The study was conducted on 59 patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF<40%). CDT serum levels were measured using CDT kit, Chromsystems Instruments & Chemicals GmbH, Germany and were expressed as a percentage of total transferrin using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).Results Nineteen patients (n = 19) expressed a normal level of carbohydrate deficiency transferrin <1.2% of the total transferrin found in plasma. The results are obtained from 34 patients (n = 34) were within the range doubtful for the test (1.2-2.5%). In 6 Patients (n = 6) the results of more than 2.5% of CDT content were observed, which could indicate chronic alcohol consumption.Conclusions No statistically significant correlations between CDT and troponin T or NT pro-BNP were identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据