4.7 Article

Phase transition characteristics and supercooling suppression of erythritol with organic salts as nucleating agents

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.108889

关键词

Erythritol; Supercooling; Latent heat; Phase change temperature; Organic salt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this paper is to mitigate the supercooling of erythritol using organic salts as nucleating agents. The results show that calcium pimelate has a positive influence on eliminating the supercooling of erythritol and improves its crystallization kinetics and thermal conductivity. Therefore, it can be considered as a new material for waste heat recovery and solar energy heat collection.
The main aim of this paper is to mitigate the supercooling of erythritol using organic salts as nucleating agents. The pure erythritol exhibits significant volume effects and a strong supercooling tendency. When the aspect ratio of the ET is small, a metastable phase transition plateau at 105 degree celsius can be observed, and then, the metastable crystal slowly transforms into a stable crystal. Experimental results reveal that calcium pimelate (CaPi) has a positive influence on the supercooling elimination of erythritol. The 1 % CaPi/erythritol composite phase change material (CPCM) melts at 118 degree celsius and solidifies at 109 degree celsius with the latent heat of 344.86 J/g and 281.8 J/g, respectively. Due to the improved crystallization kinetics, the supercooling phenomenon measured by T-history method is basically eliminated. The melting heat is >300 J/g and the change of phase change temperature is less after 50 cycles. In order to simulate the real environment, the CPCM cools down by room temperature in air, and the chemical stability is good. The thermal conductivity of 1 % CaPi/ET increases by 23.2 %. In total, the CaPi/ erythritol CPCM is a new candidate to be used in waste heat recovery, solar energy medium temperature heat collection and other fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据