4.7 Article

Ethanol stratified ultra-lean combustion with hydrogen enrichment in a constant volume vessel

期刊

FUEL
卷 357, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129638

关键词

Direct injection; Stratified combustion; Ultra-lean combustion; Constant volume vessel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This experimental study investigates the effects of ignition timings, injection pressures, and hydrogen enrichment on ethanol stratified ultra-lean combustion. The results show that the addition of hydrogen increases the stable ignition limit and improves combustion characteristics. However, delayed ignition timings and high injection pressures may result in incomplete combustion.
An experimental study was conducted to determine the effects of ignition timings, injection pressures, and hydrogen enrichment on ethanol stratified ultra-lean combustion. The combustion chamber was a constant volume vessel with an injection and ignition system. The ignition and combustion characteristics of ethanol spray with different ignition timings (0-50 ms after start of injection), injection pressures (5, 15, and 25 MPa), and hydrogen premixed equivalence ratios (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2) under ambient temperature 353 K and 1 atm. The direct injection of ethanol and hydrogen enrichment results in an increase in the stable ignition limit to an extremely lean condition: a global equivalence ratio of 0.15 (67% ethanol/33% H2). Furthermore, the probability of ignition first increased then decreased with the delay in ignition timings; rose with an increase in the injection pressure and hydrogen ratio. However, the delay in ignition timings and high injection pressures resulting in extremely lean zone in the constant volume vessel, which led to incomplete combustion. The addition of hydrogen not only stabilized ignition process but also improved the combustion characteristics. Stable ignition and combustion were achieved at early ignition timing (2-3 ms), moderate injection pressure (15 MPa), and a minimum global equivalence ratio of 0.2 (50% ethanol/ 50% H2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据