4.1 Article

New metal complexes containing a methyldopa Schiff base for carbon dioxide storage

期刊

RESULTS IN CHEMISTRY
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rechem.2023.101099

关键词

Methyldopa Schiff base; Metal complexes; Carbon dioxide storage media; Mesoporous; Surface area

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the synthesis of a new material for storing carbon emissions, particularly carbon dioxide. The metal complexes synthesized have large surface areas and pore volumes, and exhibit high carbon dioxide storage capacity.
The high concentration of carbon dioxide in the environment, including from the burning of fossil fuels to meet our energy requirements, is a pressing environmental concern that requires urgent attention. As a result, the development of novel materials for storing gases such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen has garnered greater attention in research. The current work reports the synthesis of a Schiff base derived from methyldopa and its metal complexes. In addition, their effectiveness as carbon dioxide storage materials were assessed. The reaction of methyldopa and 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde in boiling ethanol under acidic conditions for four hours gave the corresponding Schiff base in excellent yield. The reaction of metal (copper, cobalt, and nickel) chlorides and Schiff base in boiling ethanol for three hours gave the corresponding metal complexes in high yields (77-83%). The surface morphology and surface area of the synthesized metal complexes were evaluated. The mesoporous complexes have a surface area that ranges from 3.59 to 7.36 m2/g. The average pores diameter was 7.75-12.27 nm, and the pores volume was 0.0.11-0.014 cm3/g. The carbon dioxide storage capacity of the synthesized mesoporous complexes was 27.4-30.6 cm3/gm. The complex containing nickel was the most efficient towards carbon dioxide uptake (30.6 cm3/cm) possibility due to its relatively high surface area (7.36 cm2/g) and pores volume (0.014 cm3/g) compared to the copper and cobalt complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据