4.7 Article

Angiogenesis inhibitor or aggressiveness marker? The function of endostatin in cancer through electrochemical biosensing

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108571

关键词

Electrochemical bioplatform; Endostatin; Angiogenesis; Colorectal cancer aggressiveness; Tissue; Plasma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed the first electrochemical bioplatform for determining human endostatin, which shows high sensitivity and selectivity for diagnosing tumors and identifying patients in different stages.
This work reports the first electrochemical bioplatform developed for the determination of human endostatin (HE), a biomarker with recognized antiangiogenic potential whose elevated circulating levels have also been associated with the development of aggressive cancers. The developed electroanalytical biotool combines the benefits of using magnetic microparticles for the implementation of sandwich immunoassays and amperometric transduction on disposable carbon electrodes. A limit of detection (LOD) of 34.1 pg mL-1 for HE standards and a selectivity suitable for its foray into the clinical oncology area, are demonstrated. The determination of HE in clinical samples such as lysates and secretomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, plasma, and tissue samples from patients with CRC in different stages, has been faced with satisfactory results showing the ability for discrimi-nating the metastatic capabilities of cells and for identifying and staging CRC patients. The developed bio-platform allows precise quantitative determinations, requiring minimal pre-treatments and sample amounts in only 75 min. In addition, due to the instrumentation and the type of substrates used in the detection step, the biotool is compatible with implementation in multiplexed and/or point-of-need devices, features in which this bioplatform is advantageous with respect to the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immunoblotting technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据