4.1 Article

Generalized fusible numbers and their ordinals

期刊

ANNALS OF PURE AND APPLIED LOGIC
卷 175, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apal.2023.103355

关键词

Fusible number; Countable ordinal; Small Veblen ordinal; Halting problem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the properties of fusible numbers and recursively defined functions, and explores the limitations of the order types of well-ordered sets generated by repeated application of functions.
Erickson defined the fusible numbers as a set F of reals generated by repeated application of the function x+y+1 2 . Erickson, Nivasch, and Xu showed that F is well ordered, with order type epsilon 0. They also investigated a recursively defined function M : R-+ R. They showed that the set of points of discontinuity of M is a subset of F of order type epsilon 0. They also showed that, although M is a total function on R, the fact that the restriction of M to Q is total is not provable in first-order Peano arithmetic PA. In this paper we explore the problem (raised by Friedman) of whether similar approaches can yield well-ordered sets F of larger order types. As Friedman pointed out, Kruskal's tree theorem yields an upper bound of the small Veblen ordinal for the order type of any set generated in a similar way by repeated application of a monotone function g : Rn-+ R. The most straightforward generalization of x+y+1 2 to an n-ary function is the function x1+center dot center dot center dot+xn+1 . We show that this function generates a set Fn whose order n type is just phi n-1(0). For this, we develop recursively defined functions Mn : R-+R naturally generalizing the function M. Furthermore, we prove that for any linear function g : Rn-+ R, the order type of the resulting F is at most phi n-1(0). Finally, we show that there do exist continuous functions g : Rn-+ R for which the order types of the resulting sets F approach the small Veblen ordinal.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据