4.7 Article

Investigation of the Mechanical and Tribological Behavior of Epoxy-Based Hybrid Composite

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 15, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15193880

关键词

ceramic additives; solid lubricant; epoxy nanocomposite; hybrid reinforcement; tribological performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of hybrid reinforcement using Al2O3 nanoparticles and graphite on the mechanical and tribological properties of epoxy nanocomposites. The results showed that the addition of hybrid additives significantly improved the elasticity, strength, toughness, ductility, and hardness of the material, while reducing the coefficient of friction and wear.
The main target of this study is to evaluate the impact of hybrid reinforcement using Al2O3 nanoparticles and graphite on the epoxy nanocomposites' mechanical and tribological properties. Various weight fractions of the reinforcement materials, ranging from 0 to 0.5 wt.%, were incorporated into the epoxy. The aim is to enhance the characteristics and durability of the polymers for potential utilization in different mechanical applications. The addition of hybrid additives consisting of Al2O3 nanoparticles and graphite to the epoxy resin had a noticeable effect on the performance of the epoxy nanocomposites. The incorporation of these additives resulted in increased elasticity, strength, toughness, ductility, and hardness as the concentration of reinforcement increased. The enhancement in the stiffness, mechanical strength, toughness and ductility reached 33.9%, 25.97%, 25.3% and 16.7%, respectively. Furthermore, the frictional tests demonstrated a notable decrease in both the coefficient of friction and wear with the rise of the additives' weight fraction. This improvement in the structural integrity of the epoxy nanocomposites led to enhanced mechanical properties and wear resistance. The SEM was utilized to assess the surfaces of tested samples and provide insights into the wear mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据